7 | 0 | 6 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以南家咀煤矿14501回顺掘进工作面为研究对象,利用数值模拟和现场试验相结合的方法,对比分析了自然泄放和钻墙抽采2种模式下的煤壁瓦斯涌出特征。数值模拟研究结果表明,自然泄放状态下,煤壁瓦斯涌出量随暴露时间增加呈指数衰减趋势,且煤层瓦斯压力越高,相同暴露时间内的瓦斯涌出衰减越明显;钻墙截流抽采作用下,煤壁瓦斯涌出量随抽采时间增加呈指数衰减趋势,且煤层瓦斯压力越高,相同抽采时间内的瓦斯涌出衰减越明显;对比2种模式下的煤壁瓦斯涌出规律发现,抽采50 d左右时的煤壁瓦斯涌出量相对于自然暴露情况降低了24%。通过现场观测2种模式下的煤壁瓦斯涌出量与巷道瓦斯浓度变化规律,自然泄放状态下的巷道口瓦斯浓度达到0.38%,而在钻墙截流抽采作用下的巷道口瓦斯浓度迅速衰减;抽采至5 d时,巷道口瓦斯浓度降低至0.29%,表明钻墙抽采对工作面瓦斯截流效果显著。
Abstract:Taking the 14501 return airway excavation working face of Nanjiazui Coal Mine as the research object, the gas emission characteristics of coal wall under two modes of natural emission and drilling wall extraction were compared and analyzed by the method of numerical simulation and field test.The numerical simulation results shown that the gas emission of coal wall decreased exponentially with the increase of exposure time under natural emission conditions.The higher the gas pressure of coal seam, the more obvious the gas emission attenuation at the same exposure time.Under the action of drilling wall intercepting extraction, the gas emission decreased exponentially with the increase of extraction time, and the higher the gas pressure in coal seam, the more obvious the gas emission attenuation during the same extraction time.By comparing the gas emission of coal wall under the two modes, it was found that the gas emission amount at about 50 days of extraction was reduced by 24% compared with the natural emission.According to the field test result of coal wall gas emission and roadway gas concentration under the two modes, the gas concentration at the roadway entrance reached 0.38% in the state of natural emission, while the gas concentration at the roadway entrance decreased rapidly under the action of drilling wall intercepting extraction.The gas concentration decreased to 0.29% when the extraction reached 5 days, indicating that drilling wall extraction had a significant effect on the gas intercepting of the working face.
[1] 贾静,顾亮,刘宇轩,等.掘进工作面局部通风参数对瓦斯分布影响研究[J].中国矿业,2022,31(1):126-133.
[2] 王兆丰,方前程,杨利平,等.厚煤层高效截流“钻墙”边掘边抽的试验研究[J].煤矿安全,2008,39(1):8-10.
[3] 王兆丰,王治学,陈立伟,等.石港煤矿掘进工作面“钻墙”截流瓦斯技术[J].矿业安全与环保,2012,39(4):40-42.
[4] 李润芝.厚煤层掘进工作面煤壁瓦斯涌出防治技术研究[J].煤炭技术,2023,42(11):124-127.
[5] 孟永兵.综放工作面瓦斯综合抽采治理技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(12):125-128.
[6] 田富超,王兆丰,徐玉胜,等.钻墙高效截流瓦斯抽放技术在寺河煤矿的应用[J].煤炭科学技术,2009,37(8):46-48.
[7] 刘启科,王兆丰,赵豫祥.“钻墙”截流煤巷瓦斯技术试验研究[J].陕西煤炭,2009,28(6):11-13,16.
[8] 卫修君.突出危险工作面应力降低区浅孔瓦斯抽放技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2006,34(1):56-57,72.
[9] 邱永刚,许彦鹏.中厚煤层突出掘进工作面综合消突措施应用[J].煤炭工程,2010,32(1):56-57.
[10] 刘军,夏会辉,杨宏民,等.煤与瓦斯突出煤层综掘工作面瓦斯防治技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2012,40(4):67-70,74.
[11] 徐星华.高瓦斯综掘煤巷浅孔截流瓦斯抽采技术[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(5):55-58,62.
[12] 关金锋,崔洪庆,陶涛.基于截流“钻墙”的厚煤层煤巷掘进地质探测技术及工程应用[J].安全与环境学报,2016,16(1):32-35.
[13] 马国龙.煤矿瓦斯超限原因分析及预防对策研究[J].中国矿业,2023,32(7):132-138.
[14] 王登科,唐家豪,魏建平,等.煤层瓦斯多机制流固耦合模型与瓦斯抽采数值模拟分析[J].煤炭学报,2023,48(2):763-775.
[15] 张文豪,贺志宏,孔婧毓,等.煤层钻孔瓦斯抽采效果影响因素分析[J].中国矿业,2023,32(3):98-102.
[16] MORA C A,WATTENBARGER R A.Analyst and verification of dual-porosity and CBM shape factors[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2009,48(2):17-21.
[17] 王林,张贵鑫,陈向军,等.深部煤层赋存环境温度及对瓦斯吸附影响微观机制[J].煤炭技术,2022,41(11):87-90.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20120/j.cnki.issn.1671-749x.2025.0703
中图分类号:TD712.6
引用信息:
[1]秦培建,张清勇,张红印等.煤矿掘进工作面钻墙截流瓦斯抽采技术研究及应用[J].陕西煤炭,2025,44(07):13-19+44.DOI:10.20120/j.cnki.issn.1671-749x.2025.0703.
基金信息: